|
The
Salt Lake Tribune
Instructions
on 'who gets what' can head off sibling
fights
Kathy Gurchiek
The Salt Lake Tribune
The
e-mail from the woman beseeching the lawyer
for advice was plaintive, the situation
sad.
Her mother died of colon cancer without
updating the will she had written five years
earlier. She left behind a wealth of jewelry
to the married daughter -- none to her two
sons, two daughters-in-law or two young
granddaughters from her sons' marriages.
The brothers are mad, writing nasty e-mails
demanding that their sister divide the jewelry
with them, otherwise they want financial
compensation from their father.
"My
mother's friends were witness many times
to my mother saying she wanted me to have
her jewelry," the daughter wrote to
attorney Barry Fish, signing her e-mail
only as JM. The daughter gave some jewelry
of lesser value to nieces and sisters-in-law
and in her own will plans to divide any
remaining heirloom jewelry among her daughters
and nieces.
"My
mother always said that my sisters-in-law
had their own mothers to inherit jewelry
from and that I only had her. I am so confused.
Can anyone help?"
Welcome to a world where families often
are torn apart when a well-meaning parent
assumes that his or her grown children will
play nice when it comes to who gets what
in a parent's last will. The parent may
unwittingly sow the seeds for a fight that
can destroy the family.
"Parents
have this view because their children are
their children, they won't fight,"
said Les Kotzer, attorney and co-author
with Barry Fish of The Family Fight: Planning
to Avoid It. He has seen brothers and sisters
at each other's throats, family relationships
ripped to shreds along with the family photos.
"Don't
assume good will between your children,"
he advised, and don't rely on them to fairly
distribute the assets.
"If
you were to say 'I'm going to leave it all
to [my son] Billy and he'll look after [his
sister] Mary,' what if Billy dies. Will
Billy's wife have good will toward her sister-in-law?"
Perhaps Billy has financial problems and
opts not to help his sister, whom he believes
will squander money that he could use to
pay debts, Kotzer said.
"Kids
are elastic," said Kaysville attorney
Trent D. Nelson, who specializes in family
wills and trusts. "They're always changing.
You don't know what financial consequences
they're going to run into in their lives."
Math and emotion: A parent may try to be
fair by splitting things evenly, using mathematics
instead of emotion to distribute money,
mementos and other assets. However, if one
child is the caregiver, emptying bedpans
and chauffeuring the parent to doctor appointments
and the other children are rarely around,
the result is inadvertent inequality, Kotzer
said. In the case of the caregiver, he recommends
telling family members that the caregiver
is receiving a little more as a show of
appreciation.
"Being
equal is not always fair," Kotzer said.
"The phrase 'they'll work it out' really
shouldn't be in a parent's vocabulary when
it comes to estate planning. This is a very
poor way of thinking" because lawyers,
not family members, will be forced to work
it out, he said.
Consider whether you should split things
evenly even though you already helped one
adult child financially -- with college,
with a down payment for a house, with free
room and board -- and not the others. That
can create bitterness among siblings. Parents
and adult children need to talk, Kotzer
said. The discussion doesn't have to take
a "gimme" tone; instead, focus
on the importance of having an up-to-date
will.
Discussion also can be prompted by asking
the parent if he or she has established
a power of attorney in case of a debilitating
illness, Kotzer said. That choice should
be discussed; an adult child may not want
sole responsibility and does not have to
accept the appointment.
Leaving instructions: Most people think
only the rich need a will, Kotzer said,
but it is important to designate how any
assets and sentimental items are distributed.
He told of a mother who thought she was
avoiding a family fight by designating that
all her personal possessions were to be
sold within 30 days of her death and the
money divided among her children.
The woman's daughter wanted a crystal vase
that she had taken great pains to buy for
her mother, but her brothers, as executors,
were following their mother's will to the
letter. Furious, the daughter removed the
vase from her mother's house and smashed
it in the parking lot as Kotzer, who was
handling the estate, watched.
"'Now
nobody can have it,'" Kotzer quoted
her as saying. "You could sense the
hatred that was starting [because] her brothers
wouldn't give it to her," he said,
noting that "a will . . . is written
in stone, so you better get it right and
better put some thought to the wording in
that will."
The vase incident could have been avoided
if the parent had talked to her children
about her plans, asking if there were specific
items that they wanted that would be excluded
from an estate sale.
The parent should also consider how disinheriting
a family member will affect that person's
relationship with the rest of the children,
because they are the ones who will have
to deal with any emotional fallout.
Carefully weigh who to appoint as executor.
"Sometimes
they pick the person who has the most street
smarts, sometimes they pick the person who
has the most legal experience or the most
business experience," said Nelson.
"That might be the worst person to
choose if the person . . . is least trusted."
Logistical planning: Consider, too, where
that person lives. If the child you most
trust to be the executor lives in a distant
state, it is not going to work if there
is a complicated estate that is going to
take several months to administer, he said.
This causes logistical problems and can
place a financial burden and stress on the
executor who has to take time from work
to travel to handle the estate. That person
also is entitled to reimbursement for expenses,
so travel expenses may eat up the estate,
Nelson pointed out. While executors are
entitled by law to fair and reasonable compensation,
many waive payment. That often helps build
credibility in families where someone doesn't
trust the executor.
Also, rethink appointing a daughter- or
son-in-law as backup executor, Kotzer cautioned.
A child's marriage may not be permanent
and an ex-family member could end up overseeing
the will. Nelson also advised not having
co-executors, which require both parties
to agree on everything that comes up.
Many fights are over small things that never
go to court, such as who pays the freight
on a piano that was left to a relative who
lives across the country, Kotzer said. He
recommends an explanatory letter or videotape
that supplements the will, specifying why
certain items go to certain people.
"[An
explanatory letter] takes a lot of the burden
from the child who gets [the item],"
Kotzer said.
Personal property lists: In Utah, a personal
property list that outlines specific bequests
may supplement a will or trust. The list
must be referenced in the will and cannot
include bequests of money, stocks or real
property, such as a cabin. Include enough
detail -- such as "grandmother's diamond
engagement ring" -- so it is clear
which item is being given to whom.
"A
personal property list can say 'I want this
antique sewing machine to go to Joanne,'
" said Nelson. "It's not like
a will where you have to redo it . . . you
can update that without having to go through
an attorney."
Nelson emphasized the importance of considering
potential land mines when writing a will
and how to deal with them.
"You
almost have to consider worse-case scenario,"
he said. Consider giving the executor the
discretion to sell an item if an argument
ensures over who is entitled to a particular
possession.
"If
you know everybody loves your spoon set
that came over from Norway, consider who
you want that to go to. It's going to be
a lot easier for them to accept a decision
that Mom made versus a decision that the
[executor] made. If you anticipate problems
. . . over specific items, be very clear
about it."
An attempt to avoid tax liabilities can
also sow the seeds of a family fight, as
happened when a parent stipulated in his
homemade will that one son inherited a bowling
alley. Everything else, including property
the bowling alley sat on, went to other
siblings. They became their brother's landlords,
and urged on by their spouses, raised the
rent where their brother lived and created
a family rift.
Expectations: Kotzer also is seeing more
adult children who feel entitled to the
fruits of their Depression-era parents'
scrimping.
"That
generation was a saving generation. They
were the coupon cutters. They would keep
the same car for many years, whereas my
generation are sort of the spenders. We
grew up in the '70s and we have to have
the latest technology, the latest fad. Our
parents were always the ones saying 'save
your money, wait for a rainy day,' "
he said.
Kotzer recalled one client who arrived at
his office driving an expensive car, wearing
designer clothing and a Rolex watch. The
client had lost everything in the dot-com
crash; he was now a "waiter" but
Kotzer was puzzled. How could he afford
such a wealthy lifestyle if he was waiting
tables? Turns out he was waiting to inherit
his parents' assets.
"There
is an assumption out there that what was
your parents will be yours, and will be
yours equally with your siblings. This is
where the problem comes in," Kotzer
said. Things turn ugly when an adult child
doesn't receive what he or she expected.
That problem can be avoided by being up-front
with the children so there are no presumptions.
Remarriages also can pose problems for parents
who intend to leave their children everything,
but "everything" -- home, bank
account, insurance and pension -- is jointly
owned by the surviving spouse. Those partners
receive a windfall because the deceased
spouse didn't understand that everything
that is jointly owned goes to the surviving
spouse, regardless of the will, Kotzer said.
If that new spouse later dies without updating
his or her own will, family possessions
intended for one set of children instead
are passed onto the new spouse's children.
Parents should be aware, too, of the consequences
of holding a joint bank account with an
adult child. Often this is done because
it allows the child to conduct bank business
on the parent's behalf. When the parent
dies, that child receives everything in
the account.
The potential for warfare over a will can
affect any family. Multimillions do not
have to be at stake. Nelson recalled three
sisters who fought for more than a year
over the small estate of their father, who
died without a will.
"They
never mourned the passing of their father.
They got so caught up with fighting with
each other that they forgot that they lost
their father," he said.
"The
average family doesn't understand how close
to the line they are. It doesn't take much
for the family to be destroyed," Kotzer
said.
"Just
be organized," Nelson said. "Doing
nothing is the best way to have problems."
|